
正文
my11_mysql事务隔离
提示:扫一扫查出行【扫一扫了解最新限行尾号】
复制提示
概述
************************************************
Mysql有四个事务隔离级别,默认隔离级别为RR,开启一个事务可以使用 START TRANSACTION。
START TRANSACTION
[transaction_characteristic [, transaction_characteristic] ...]
transaction_characteristic:
WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT
| READ WRITE
| READ ONLY
START TRANSACTION默认为READ ONLY方式,但若在其中执行DML语句时,自动转化为READ WRITE方式。开启事务除非显式commit或者遇到DDL语句等,否则事务将一直停留
mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_trx\G;
Empty set (0.20 sec)ERROR:
No query specifiedmysql>
mysql>
mysql> insert into sbtest1(k,c,pad) select k,c,pad from sbtest1 limit 100000;
Query OK, 100000 rows affected (6.89 sec)
Records: 100000 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_trx\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
trx_id: 10044
trx_state: RUNNING
trx_started: 2018-08-06 11:25:58
trx_requested_lock_id: NULL
trx_wait_started: NULL
trx_weight: 101373
trx_mysql_thread_id: 11
trx_query: select * from information_schema.innodb_trx
trx_operation_state: NULL
trx_tables_in_use: 0
trx_tables_locked: 2
trx_lock_structs: 1373
trx_lock_memory_bytes: 139472
trx_rows_locked: 101370
trx_rows_modified: 100000
trx_concurrency_tickets: 0
trx_isolation_level: REPEATABLE READ
trx_unique_checks: 1
trx_foreign_key_checks: 1
trx_last_foreign_key_error: NULL
trx_adaptive_hash_latched: 0
trx_adaptive_hash_timeout: 0
trx_is_read_only: 0
trx_autocommit_non_locking: 0
1 row in set (0.00 sec)ERROR:
No query specifiedmysql> commit;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.47 sec)mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_trx\G;
Empty set (0.00 sec)ERROR:
No query specified
测试方法
***********************************************************
开启两个会话A与B,在会话B设置相应的事务隔离级别后,在会话A中插入数据(插入大量数据,而不是一条数据,延长DML事务的时间以观察效果),在会话B中查询SQL。大概分以下三种情况:
1. 会话A插入数据的时间点在会话B执行查询SQL之前
2. 会话A插入数据的时间点在会话B执行查询SQL之后,但查询SQL尚未结束时
2. 会话A正在插入数据一直未结束,会话B不断地执行查询SQL
查看当前事务隔离级别
**********************************************************************
mysql版本
mysql> select version();
+-----------+
| version() |
+-----------+
| 8.0.11 |
+-----------+
1 row in set (0.04 sec)
现线上运行数据库的事务隔离级别通常为RR级别,MVCC(Multiversion Concurrency Control,多版本并发控制)解决了幻读的问题。
mysql> show variables like '%isolation%';
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| transaction_isolation | REPEATABLE-READ |
+-----------------------+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)mysql> select @@global.transaction_isolation;
+--------------------------------+
| @@global.transaction_isolation |
+--------------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ |
+--------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> select @@session.transaction_isolation;
+---------------------------------+
| @@session.transaction_isolation |
+---------------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ |
+---------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> select @@transaction_isolation;
+-------------------------+
| @@transaction_isolation |
+-------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ |
+-------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
read uncommitted事务隔离级别
*****************************************************
会话A插入120万条记录数据
mysql> insert into sbtest1(k,c,pad) select k,c,pad from sbtest1 limit 1200000;
会话B设置事务隔离级别为read uncommitted
set session transaction isolation level read uncommitted;
start transaction;
select count(*) from sbtest1;
在会话A数据还没有commit还在不断的插入的过程中,会话B查询范围内的数据在不断地增加,也就是会话B可以看到会话A未提交的数据
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 14471333 |
+----------+
1 row in set (27.78 sec)
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 14863456 |
+----------+
1 row in set (22.86 sec)
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 15057947 |
+----------+
1 row in set (8.69 sec)
read committed事务隔离级别
*****************************************************
会话B设置事务隔离级别为read committed
set session transaction isolation level read committed;
start transaction;
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where id > 10000000;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 9919550 |
+----------+
1 row in set (14.01 sec)
在会话B第二次查询之后,在会话A中插入1.2万条记录数据,用时10秒
mysql> insert into sbtest1(k,c,pad) select k,c,pad from sbtest1 limit 12000;
Query OK, 12000 rows affected (10.43 sec)
Records: 12000 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
可以看到会话B查询的结果仍与之前一样,并没有因为会话A插入数据而改变,但会话B的查询时间变长了(由原来的14秒左右变为了41秒左右)
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where id > 10000000;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 9919550 |
+----------+
1 row in set (41.61 sec)
RU离职级别存在脏读,而RC隔离级别中,每次select都会开启一个“一致性快照读”,所以会话A的事务还没有提交的话,读取的结果是一致的,因为快照中的事务列表没有变化。
同时,也正因为RC中是“每次select”都会开启一个“一致性快照读”,如果两次select之间有事务的变化,那么后面的select由于是一个新的快照读,所以可以查询到事务的变化。因此,
在会话B中进行第三次查询,即在会话Acommit之后查询,可以看到数据增加了1.2万条记录
mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where id > 10000000;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 9931550 |
+----------+
1 row in set (12.69 sec)
这种在同一个事务里,两次查询结果不一致的现象就是不可重复读
repeatable read事务隔离级别
****************************************************************************
RR事务隔离级别是Mysql数据库的默认事务隔离级别
set session transaction isolation level repeatable read;
RR级别的事务中,会话A中不断插入数据,会话B的结果不变;但会话A数据插入对会话B的查询依然有影响,无数据插入查询用时约0.3秒,插入10万记录,查询用时在4-10秒间波动。
mysql> set session transaction isolation level repeatable read;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> show variables like '%isolation';
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| transaction_isolation | REPEATABLE-READ |
| tx_isolation | REPEATABLE-READ |
+-----------------------+-----------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 1500000 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.28 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 1500000 |
+----------+
1 row in set (10.99 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 1500000 |
+----------+
1 row in set (4.05 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 1500000 |
+----------+
1 row in set (4.04 sec)
那RR又是怎么做到了可重复读呢?
前面说到RC是每次select都开启一个“一致快照读”,而RR是在事务中的第一次select时开启一致性快照读,后面的select不再开启,同一事务中所有select读取的是同一个一致性快照的事务,
所以,每次select得到的结果是一样的。这么做相对RC是有代价的,直接代价就是加锁的时间更长(RC是每次select结束时就自动释放了,RR是等你手工commit结束事务才释放),另外,在内部的实现上,需要更多的锁来保证这个功能。






